One of the main impacts that Digital Media has left on the film industry is piracy. Now that the internet is so wide, it is very easy for films to leak out on to the internet and be made available for download. This has obvious effects on the industry including loss of profits.
Illegal film downloads are very damaging to the economy of the Film Industry. Film companies are losing money when their film is watched online. The Guardian reported in March 2011 that illegal downloads are “threatening the future” of the British Film Industry (1). They further stated that estimated losses were “around £500 million per year” (1). This is a significant amount of money that is being lost in the industry. Has it become too easy to get a hold of films online that is now seen as convenience over making a trip to the cinema?
There is an argument surrounding why people should pay to sit in a cinema screen when they can sit and watch a movie in the comfort of their own home for free. Films that are on a limited cinema release reach a wider audience online but the film industry is a business and “movies need to be paid for” (2). I was told that the people who download the most films illegally are the group of people who go to the cinema most often. This could be supported by the fact that in Avatar was downloaded 16.6 million times via various torrent websites yet it still made over $1 billion at the box office in 2009 (3). The film then went on to break home release sales records (3).
In 2010, the government introduced the Digital Economy Bill. This bill introduced penalties for individuals for the online infringement of copyright (4). The act however, was challenged by BT and TalkTalk as a company called MediaCat claimed to have IP addresses of illegal downloaders (5). There was that this only identifies one internet router which could be used by multiple people and this does not identify the individual who is downloading (5).
This case was taken to court and on the 20th of April 2011, the Daily Mail reported that the appeal was “thrown out of High Court” (6). Their reason for this was to “protect the creative industries hit hard by online piracy” (6). This is a positive outcome for the film industry but Daniel Hamilton described the act as a “worrying incursion on users’ personal privacy and freedom of access to information” (6). Is he right? Is this a step too far into people’s privacy? Maybe this is the only way to start making a stop to this problem?
I think that the problem of film piracy is currently in fact too wide to take effective action. It is very damaging to the industry but I think it has gone on too long and become too easy that it will be a hard thing to crack down on with a new law that is just being enforced now and not several years ago.
References
1. Thorpe, Vanessa (13 March 2011), http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/mar/13/illegal-downloads-threaten-british-film, Accessed 14 April 2011
2. Carey, Lavinia (9 February 2006),http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/4691216.stm#2, Accessed 29 March 2011
3. Child, Ben (22 December 2010),http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2010/dec/22/avatar-illegal-downloads-torrent-chart, Accessed 20 April 2011
4. UK Government Legislation (8 April 2010), http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/24/introduction, Accessed 20 April 2011
5. Burkhill, Guy (22 March 2011), http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2011/mar/22/acslaw-filesharing-digital-economy-act, Accessed 20 April 2011
6. Daily Mail (20 April 2011), http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1378803/Internet-piracy-crackdown-approved-appeal-Digital-Economy-Act-fails.html, Accessed 20 April 2011